The Ghost in the Manuscript

Header image for "Ronel The Mythmaker": Main text: "The Ghost in the Manuscript" Subtitle: "New stories, folklore discoveries, and publishing adventures" Visual theme: A dark, gothic fantasy illustration in deep shades of purple, featuring ornate filigree framing, glowing fairy lights, a stack of books with lit candles on the right, and a dark-haired fairy with large wings sitting on the left.

It’s the first Wednesday of the month and time for another posting of the IWSG.

The awesome co-hosts for the October 7 posting of the IWSG are Ronel Janse van Vuuren, Liza at Middle Passages, JH Moncrieff, and Jemima Pett!

I’m #37 on the list!

An ornate, gothic-style badge for "The Insecure Writer's Support Group," rendered in aged, rusted metal with a filigree frame featuring skulls and thorny vines. The central text, in a decorative, spiky font, reads "The Insecure Writer's Support Group," set against a dark, spiderweb-filled background with a hint of a lighthouse structure and a raven silhouette. Small skulls are positioned at the corners of the frame.
Learn more here.

October 7 question: Many people are calling for writers who use AI to disclose it. Most who employ ghostwriters do not admit it – do you think authors who use ghostwriters should have to disclose that, too? 

That’s a loaded question… for some.

I’m a Writer. I Write.

I’m a writer. I write. I edit. I rewrite. I edit. I rewrite. I proofread. (Maybe I missed a step or two there?) There is no place there for a ghost writer to step in – let alone something other to do the writing for me.

And why would I? The fun part of being a writer is the writing. Though, I do enjoy editing and rewriting and proofreading, too.

There was a time (2025!) I had stickers on my covers saying “written by a human”. I’ve been rebuilding and rebranding this year, so that’s not something I do anymore. But readers can trust that every word in a book I wrote was written by me. That’s a Ronel the Mythmaker promise. Just like entering the Faerie Mythos is a promise of rich worldbuilding, myths, magic, fierce heroines, and stories that make you think.

If you only want to share story ideas and have someone else write it, there’s a place for that, too. But that doesn’t make you a writer.

A moody, close-up photograph of an open, antique book resting on a dark, aged wooden plank desk. A glass inkwell is positioned in the lower-right foreground, slightly out of focus. An ornate, filigreed dip pen with a silver nib rests diagonally across the open pages, which feature aged, yellowed paper and dense, handwritten German script in a dark, old-world ink.

To the upper-left, a pair of ghostly, translucent hands emerge from a soft, ethereal mist, holding another, similar silver pen. This ghost pen's nib is just touching the paper. Below the existing text, a line has been ghost-written in the same script, but with a translucent, ethereal quality, asking: "...wait... who's writing this?". The scene is dramatically lit, with a cool, dark tone, emphasizing textures and creating deep shadows. The depth of field is shallow, drawing the eye to the pens and the central question. The overall feeling is one of antique mystery and the supernatural.

Who Actually Wrote the Book?

There’s this screenwriter whose work I’ve enjoyed my entire life. You can rewatch his stories and find something new every time. The writer/actor I’m talking about is, of course, Willie Esterhuizen.

The last two series of his I watched, he credits a close friend, an actress who has starred in his work, as the source of ideas for these stories. He still wrote the episodes himself, but Hélène Truter gave him ideas: like a Muse. She’s not insisting on writing credits, because she didn’t write anything. (Though she’s a writer herself.)

Which brings me back to this month’s question: if a ghostwriter does the writing and not you, you’re not a writer. #SorryNotSorry

If someone else wrote the book, it should be disclosed. Not because there’s anything wrong with using a ghostwriter, but readers deserve to know who actually wrote the words they’re reading.

And Then There’s AI

The same if your AI of choice did the bulk of the writing…

I’m not sure Gemini (or whoever) is going to credit you for ideas for stories they wrote like Willie did with Hélène.

Credits screen for "Huis Lelieveld":   Logo: A teal house outline enclosing the text "Huis Lelieveld" above a pink and green lotus flower.   Story Ideas and Script Editor: Hélène Truter   Editing: Pieter Esterhuizen   Screenwriter: Willie Esterhuizen   Director: Willie & Pieter Esterhuizen   Background features a soft-focus, watercolor-style illustration of colorful flowers under a light blue sky.

This isn’t the first time I’ve written about the ethics of the publishing industry, either. I went down that particular rabbit hole last year in Unethical Publishing Industry Practices.

Where Do We Draw the Line?

The question this month is a bit ambivalent: Does disclosure mean “AI was used to generate the text of this book,” or does it mean “AI was used at any point in the creation of this book”?

I’m asking this because there have been reader events where authors have been disinvited for AI use – not in their writing, but in their marketing.

If you go on Pixabay, Pexels, and other free image sites, you’d be hard-pressed to find an image that has no AI involvement (people use AI to clean up photos, so that probably counts as AI usage…).

Programs like Canva have magical capabilities to change the tone, focus, texture and more of images… AI?

Where do we draw the line between disclosure and TMI?

With AI witch hunts destroying careers, should we add fuel to the fire? Will having a pretty book cover instead of something that looks like it came from a haunted 80s computer with Courier typeset get you burned at the stake?

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

And then I watched a video by Kevin Tumlinson about AI book cover design.

His advice?

Don’t ask, don’t tell.

And all I could think was: Well, I’ve watched enough American TV series to know where that phrase comes from…

Maybe we really have reached the point where we need to ask ourselves whether knowing exactly where — and how — AI was used actually helps readers, or whether we’re just creating another purity test.

Because if AI wrote the book? Tell me.

If AI designed the cover? …do I really need to know?

So Where Would You Draw the Line?

So what do you think? Should authors disclose the use of ghostwriters? What about AI — and does it matter whether AI helped write the book, design the cover, or polish the marketing?

Where would you draw the line?

Writing & career quote graphic by Ronel The Mythmaker:   Quote text: "Embrace change and temper it with ethics."   Attribution: Ronel Janse van Vuuren   Visual theme: A profile shot of a black and tan Rottweiler dog gently sniffing white blossoms outdoors in a garden setting.
An author banner titled "RONEL THE MYTHMAKER" in a dark, ethereal fantasy theme with purple and black tones. On the left, a detailed illustration depicts a melancholic fae woman with large, translucent gossamer wings, wild ash-blonde hair adorned with a floral crown, and pointed ears, looking back over her shoulder amidst dark ivy vines. The right side features a dark purple, textured background with a central white and purple logo of a moth under a crescent moon, framed by delicate botanical filigree. Below the logo, the main text reads "RONEL THE MYTHMAKER" in a clean serif font. Underneath a decorative divider line, three lines of stylized italic text read: "Keeper of folklore, Weaver of faery tales. Creator of modern myths." with the words "folklore," "faery tales," and "modern myths" highlighted in a lighter lavender. At the bottom, flanked by small leaf illustrations, is the website text: "RONELTHEMYTHMAKER.COM". The entire banner is framed by an ornate, vintage-style purple border with decorative corners.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *